The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peppercomm[edit]

Peppercomm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my specific PROD here which state and shows everything listed here is simply what the company wants to advertise about itself and including what other advertising information other people have published, either to help advertise said company or to republish company words; what has actually now been added are exactly that, and that's not surprising because that's what this company's business is and involves. I still note that the history clearly shows these same advertising intentions and actions. SwisterTwister talk 01:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 01:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable PR agency going about its business. Nothing stands out about this one. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can't figure out what we can say this company is notable for. Unless we are going to say getting on a few lists of "best companies to work for" is enough? Anyone? I don't think these are significant awards but correct me if I'm wrong. Other media care who is going to be Time's person of the year, but I don't see other media rushing to tell us who got on Forbes' list of best workplaces. Everything else I see is WP:ROUTINE coverage, press releases, and advertorials. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.