The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 08:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Bahoda[edit]

Peer Bahoda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no idea if this city is notable enough to be included. The editor's version copied the contents from Bareilly so the population and other information are likely wrong. It may be better to delete and start over. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:07, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Typically I would say this is notable under WP:GEOLAND and put a source on it to affirm at least some of the data in the article. However, I can't find any sources to back up anything in the infobox, besides the fact that it exists. My !vote is conditional on if anyone can find any type of reliable source to back up where it is, any substantial information, etc. If someone can do that I'm a keep, but (as is looking likely) they cannot, then I will be a redirect to Bareilly. Deadbeef 00:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.