The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and move Pecq, Belgium over. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pecq[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary disambig, only 2 entries that don't even have exact matches (possibly speedy as per WP:G6). Once deleted, make Pecq, Belgium the primary article and add hat notes to both articles. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: would be a very useful redirect to either topic; no evidence to support either as primary topic, so this dab page is appropriate. PamD 09:21, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No evidence is needed: the entries are different! Primary topic for Pecq is Pecq, Belgium, whereas primary topic for Le Pecq is Le Pecq. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - obviously unnecessary dab page, Belgian town should be moved to "Pecq" as you say (should never have been moved away from it, as it was in Nov 2004), not sure why I ever said otherwise. PamD 09:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to Pecq, Belgium - where's the ambiguity? I doubt if anyone could mix up the two quite distinct names, but if they did a hat note on Pecq, Belgium should be enough. Andyjsmith (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move Pecq, Belgium to Pecq, with hatnote to similarly-named Le Pecq. Boleyn (talk) 08:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- That's what I actually proposed, but it requires deletion first. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and move Pecq, Belgium to primary topic with hatnote. PamD 09:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.