The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pearson PLC. J04n(talk page) 04:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pearson VUE[edit]

Pearson VUE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was very promotional; I've cleaned it up and tried to add some reliable sources, but I really can't find anything to establish notability. There are some passing comments in a few articles, but nothing more than "Company X uses Pearson VUE, a provider of electronic testing, for Exam Y." Mention of the company is brief at best. Merging with Pearson PLC is possible, but I don't think there's anything in the article worth merging. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 16:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I'm seeing a couple of news mentions etc, but doesn't seem to be anything that would qualify as significant coverage. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 07:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Pearson PLC. I don't see independent notability for this particular product. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:17, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.