The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Pacifico[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

musician lacking notability, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. original research. part of a campaign to introduce articles related to The AllStars. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the article, updated sources and pictures to demonstrate notability. Whilst there is absolutely a connection between Paul Pacifico and The AllStars, my feeling is that both are notable together and independently. I hope the updates have demonstrated this and welcome any feedback that will help continue to improve the entry. Musicfanlondon (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References added do not indicate any significant coverage. All are just trivial mentions in passing (or just incorrect references altogether, pointing to articles having nothing at all to do with Pacifico). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Looks NN tome. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.