The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parsi Characters in bollywood movies[edit]

Parsi Characters in bollywood movies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Indiscriminate list, no sources. Someone tried to list this but didn't finish, and of course, I was the only person in the whole project to noticed the redlinked afd in the log. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--I agree: list with no assertions, explanations, notabilities, or references attached to it. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • DO NOT DELETE -- I disagree completely: The article is in process of being modified and polished. It is a long drawn process and you cannot pass a judgement like this, without reasonable grounds. Isn't it a moderators duty also to verify the source and also exercise reasonable restraint while marking articles for deletion? It seems that the mods interest here is placed higher than the General Wikipedia interest. In such a list you cannot expect assertions and explanations. The only ground you were right on was sources / references, which have now been provided. It does not seem that the mod has understood the contents of the article and hence has acted rashly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruzbehraja (talk • contribs) 04:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- WP:NOTDIRECTORY, and cross-categorization. The article is indiscriminate collection of information, asserts no importance of the list and is poorly sourced. Also, why are there both PROD and AfD tags on the article? More notably PROD was added immediately after AfD. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 06:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.