This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, so keep. Dmcdevit·t 00:21, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Parawiki[edit]

This article is vanity (or do we make an exception for other wikis?) --R.Koot 02:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. --R.Koot 03:17, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 11:34, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, that was a though one, but seems like a legitimate initiative by Kassel University on a topic that surely is notable.-Poli (talk • contribs) 13:55, 2005 July 21 (UTC)
  • True, but even though it is from an an acedemic institution, it still read as commercial propaganda. It would need to be rewritten at least. --R.Koot 14:29, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Unless it's been changed recently, I don't see how it's propaganda. A small simple article about a small simple project, deserves a mention in here. Themindset 16:48, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Notability is unclear. I don't think we should make an exception after all the forum listings we've deleted... Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 17:43, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep. (A rewrite would be good though.) — Bcat (talk | email) 21:18, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• MERGE into List of wikis 132.205.44.43 15:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and an entry to the List of wikis (i.e. not a merge and redirect). -Splash 17:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep if rewritten and expanded. Some notability. JamesBurns 02:51, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.