The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Papaya CMS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. A quick search returns no third party sources. Spiesr (talk) 20:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches reveal no significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 22:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- THENEWMONO 23:15, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third party sources listed, could find none through search AlgebraT (talk) 05:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it It's the CMS of choice for quite a few websites of large institutions. Google lists > 42,000 hits. The latest major version update was covered on the most important German news website, heise.de: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Papaya-5-0-mit-mehr-Performance-und-verbesserter-Skalierung-842907.html 87.78.216.224 (talk) 06:24, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it Perhaps the delete-voters don't understand German, but the 3rd party sources are clearly present. Among the 3rd party sources are printed books that are indexed by google and a scientific paper (the later found through google scholar). If you disagree, please explain why you think those are not valid 3rd party sources. RandomUserName (talk) 22:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sufficient sources in german to support notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.