The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Mgm|^(talk) 22:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Panphilia[edit]

Panphilia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, please delete, or move to wikitionary. Edit:Possible neologism, so retracting move request for now. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 01:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Transwiki to wiktionary and delete (unless the article is expanded). (EhJJ)^TALK 01:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE I tried dictionary.com and define:Panphilia in google, word did not show up in either. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 01:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Delete per WP:Neologism. (EhJJ)^TALK 01:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Neologism. See: http://sites.google.com/site/panphiliawiki/. Does not belong in wiktionary imo.ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 01:14, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Neologism, you can stick this on Urban Dictionary. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does WP:CSD#A1 qualify here? —BradV 05:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per authority of the dictionary. Drmies (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete (A3) lack of content. This has no chance of expanding beyond a dicdef status. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:29, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.