The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. despite limited participation, because it's clear that there is no notability DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Panigrahi Labs[edit]

Panigrahi Labs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. Coverage consists of a single Crunchbase article and some startup coverage. Otherwise I can only find LinkedIn and social media stuff. Article is more promotional than informative. Jbh^Talk 18:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jbh^Talk 18:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Jbh^Talk 18:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jbh^Talk 18:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Finding no significant coverage in reliable sources; does not meet WP:N at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.