The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to West Pakistan. ansh 666 04:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan West[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search turns up nothing. This is one of many Pakistani dummy publications. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam per 13 Pakistani newspapers you've probably never heard of, as noted in the nomination. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and redirect to West Pakistan as a valid ((R from incorrect name)) that seems easy enough to confuse. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 02:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.