The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep no consensus to merge or delete, the band also does indeed seem to meet WP:MUSIC #6. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Painface (band)[edit]

Painface (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable band Ecoleetage (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP It appears as though this band was the precursor to Slipknot (band) which is notable. Iepeulas (talk) 02:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question Would it make sense to merge this into the Slipknot article? Ecoleetage (talk) 03:00, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge any relevant and sourced info into Slipknot (band).  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 12:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. A separate article is unneeded. — _Maggot^Syn 16:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - the topic of the article obviously meets WP:BAND criterion 6. There is sufficient relevant content in the article that is irrelevant to Slipknot (e.g. the second and third iterations of Painface) to justify a separate article. As AfD is not cleanup, I recommend this discussion be closed and editors focus their attention on improving the article. ɥʞoɹoɯoʞS 17:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.