The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. —Cleared as filed. 00:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PabloDraw[edit]

Nearly 200 unique Googles and still I don't see it as notable? My standards must be too high. Or not. Just zis Guy you know? 22:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not-notable. Bobby1011 23:30, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Monkeyman^(talk) 23:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, or failing that, Merge and Redirect to ANSI art. Wikipedia scores rather poorly on that topic as a whole, which isn't surprising as it predates the Internet boom. Further, the article claims clearly why it is notable software in its own field. I also checked Wikipedia:Notability (software): "The bound of 5000 users is only one of the criteria for notability, and is intended for software of general use (e.g., a text editor); notability of specialized software is better established by the other criteria." squell 03:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. recommending this for deletion smells suspiciously of early 90's ansi rivalries. as squell says, at worst this should be merged and redirected to ANSI art. --G0zer 03:18, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.