The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PTools[edit]

This entry fails the criteria of WP:CORP. Based on the fact the creator's id is from the corp, it likely also fails WP:OR and WP:VANITY. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 12:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 13:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - spam (see the history) written in excruciating managementspeak. BTLizard 13:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - blatant ad. -IceCreamAntisocial 20:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Advertising spam. SkipSmith 22:52, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, spamcruft. RFerreira 04:28, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.