The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PM Kulkarni[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biographical article of a non-notable professor. The subject fails WP:PROF. No coverage in any reliable sources, just profile pages. Name has been mentioned in a newspaper article but the topic of discussion is different. — Bill william compton^Talk 13:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Many google books links show him as author or co-author.--GDibyendu (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per David Eppstein. Google links are, well problematic, because there are a lot of people with the same name. In particular, the Google Scholar link gives articles by somebody who does not match this bio. Ray^Talk 16:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.