The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oxley gin[edit]

I removed the spam tag, as I don't see any advertisement anywhere, but don't think it fits under any criteria (possible hoax though). I'm assuming this is a home-made recipe. Not notable, Gsearched it and found no relevant searches. Zoo Fari 01:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete hard to classify though. -Falcon8765 (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam, probably copied verbatim from a press release or other promotional material. I recommend adding Cold Distillation to this AfD, since it's clearly related spam for the same nonnotable product. Despite a single report in a possibly reliable source, both articles fail WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:N. Deor (talk) 13:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it also appears to be original research seeing that the POV is not neutral. There is some WP:HOWTO involved as well. Zoo Fari 15:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Despite the nominator's removal of the ((db-spam)) tag, this still looks like blatant advertising to me, and there is no attempt at showing notability through third-party publications. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks All for your comments and concerns on this page. I'm keen to make appropriate changes so that information on Oxley Gin can be published. Oxley is a gin, a new product and therefore new brand which is now available to buy in small quantities in the UK and the US.
We have published a press release, which states similar things as i have added to the wikipedia text in debate, but this is all correct.
Recipe 38 is the recipe of the gin, this section of the text was intended to provide more information on the make up of the gin and how it is produced.
Being a new product, there are very few other online references to it, other than links to purchase in and some press coverage we have got. I'd appreciate your comments on what else can i add or change to improve the text. Thanks Tomjefferies —Preceding undated comment added 17:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.