The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overlap.org[edit]

1. WP:NOT soapbox 2. Self-promotion 3. Advertising of their website Overlap.org, 4. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Internet guides, 5. WP:COI Editing from too close "little-known musician or band should preferably not be by the musician, no verifiable notoriety given 6. NPOV, 7. style, 8. unreferenced Widefox 04:48, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Almost a speedy. MER-C 05:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wow, that's a nom with attitude! Delete per it. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk | BT sites} 08:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per every one of the 8 points the nominator has put forward, I agree completely. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete just because I had to join in ST47Talk 11:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete point 9 "no verifiable notoriety" Widefox 11:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete per every point put forward above and also no citing of sources Matthuxtable 11:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I think the nomination says it all --Amxitsa 22:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.