- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 09:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Oslo KK (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim to any notability (having one or more famous members doesn't mean this club inherits their fame). Fails WP:NORG. P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, what you have to remember is its notability within the sport of canoeing. And within this small sport this is a remarkable entity. Geschichte (talk) 19:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry but that is not supported by WP:RS. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It explains why the sources don't pour out the doors and windows. But check out the article as it currently stands. Geschichte (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Our coverage of canoeing is very weak. This article has multiple independent references. Of course they talk about the members, but its hard to see what else they could be expected to talk about. Rathfelder (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the article has seen expansion and addition of references on November 18. But IMO, the references still don't establish notability (merely its existence); its notability is clearly coat-tailing on the fame of some of its members. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.