The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Origenboard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. One GNews hit from a not reliable source. General GHits show either self-published or not reliable sources. No GScholar hits, including patent apps. GregJackP Boomer! 04:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. There are many of these boards. It needs some third-party comment before it can survive here. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No mentions in independent sources. --Kvng (talk) 03:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.