The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Organizational orientations theory[edit]

Organizational orientations theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for the significance of the theory. Some of the references are untraceable, and Google Scholar and google shows that no publication on this theory has had more than a very small number of references. Some of the people associated with the article are notable -- but that's because of their other work, none of which is very closely related to this.

This was apparently the result of an educational assignment back in 2009. We were just starting such projects then, had had very little in the way of standards to go by. . DGG ( talk ) 06:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I had originally thought this was possibly content worth preserving, but based on further information from DGG who I consider to be our go-to on all things academic, shift to delete based on the lack of reference to/use of this theory in the academic world. StarM 15:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.