The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opusmodus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT. Noting one article on musicradar.com, I don't see the in-depth coverage in multiple quality sources normally required to establish notability. Rentier (talk) 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opusmodus is a widely used software in academia like the Mozarteum Uni, Utah Uni and others. Opusmodus main goal is to introduce coding systems to education and not creating ad's on media. Wikipedia should put more emphasis on what articles are about and there the quality contribute positively to our culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikigmm (talk • contribs) 10:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The software exists, but the references don't support much beyond that. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete fundamentally for lack of significant coverage to establish notability. Also for covert attempt of promotion against Wikipedia policies. The SPA author has never edited any mainspace page except this article since account creation in 2015. This is enough indicator of what he is here for. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.