- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can be restored for merging etc. Sandstein 08:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- OpenAMP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article not only lacks any references, but is so full of lingo and jargon that I don't even know where to begin figuring out its realworld notability. KDS4444Talk 08:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is a proposal for a multi-OS on a single system standard, led by Xilinx and is discussed briefly on the Multicore Association page. There have been PR announcements[1][2], and there is code. But it seems WP:TOOSOON for significant third party reliables sources to develop. It might be best to merge this to Multicore Association, the sponsoring organization. --Mark viking (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The page was just created and is still a work in progress, references/Links/citations were added, wording to clarify some of the 'lingo'/'jargon' added. The FOSS OpenAMP project is live and well and do not depends on the Multicore Association to exist on GitHUB. The Multicore Association work regarding OpenAMP is too recent and not open (expensive membership required to know what is going on behind the door). The two pages shall not be combined as they are separate, but reference can be added to the MCA page --User:uglybear 06:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:59, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.