The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opang Jamir

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability: The statement that Jamir won Mister International India 2012 (hereafter "MI2012") was sourced via a citation to Wikipedia (more precisely to the article on MI2012), that I removed. The article about MI2012 was prodded and deleted on 2016-11-23 for lack of notability.

The article has 36 sources. Of those, many look primary: sources 5 to 8 are self-published; 32, 34, 35 and 36 are by a family member (Metsubo Jamir); and sources 2, 18 and 31 are in Jamir's website (nagalandpost.com). Because the article on MI2012 was deleted, I suspect that this BLP is unnotable too. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 19:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. 1st ever Indian to win an Indian pageant? Uh. Doesn't seem to pass GNG. I have much more AGF in the nom here, and trust that they looked and failed to find any good sources, plus WP:SPA creator User:Opangjamirmetsubo almost certainly has a COI. Vanity spam. Wikipedia is not here to promote people. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The COI and SPA are confirmed. The account has only a single edit, that was the autobiography creation. I've started a discussion at the COI noticeboard regarding its COI. I even cited your vote ("WP:SPA"). Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 15:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Serious lack of significant independent sources. Notability under WP:GNG absent and no SNG seems applicable. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article's creator added more sources, but there is still a lack of independent sources. Two of the new sources are two different links to the same page. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 18:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – An editor with an apparent COI (same name as subject of the article) has been adding cites, but most of these are duplicates, not RS, or only mention the subject in passing. I am not finding enough independent RS to support notability. Kendall-K1 (talk) 03:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.