The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete, as above. Nothing of any real-world significance. J Milburn (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article appears to have no real world information and no sourcing. Not remotely encylopaedic. Eshlare (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG, the topic has not been the subject of significant coverage in secondary independent sources.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage in third party sources, which makes it impossible to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.