The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One-handed catch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A broad concept that likely has had several notable instances of it occurring, but on its own is not suitable as a Wikipedia article. Lizard (talk) 01:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jweiss11 (talk) 01:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a chance - a chance - that a well-written article on this topic could be notable. This is not that article. Instead of WP:TNT, deletion is the best bet, as blowing up would delete the article in and of itself. SportingFlyer talk 02:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 02:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sports trivia, unencyclopedic._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Drop it. I could possibly see a catch-all (I'm on a roll!) List of sports catches, e.g. the Helmet Catch, The Catch (baseball), the Immaculate Reception, etc., but the simple one-handed variety is all too common. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:55, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.