The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as neo, dicdef. Tychocat 10:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable joke neologism, not funny enough for BJAODN. JIP | Talk 14:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete No such phobia, as it says in the article, but references to it appear across the internet and there should be an article pointing out the fact that it is NOT a phobia appearing in DSM-IV and is in fact, a made up word. Cypherzero0
The above appears to be using non-notability as proof of notability. JIP | Talk 16:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Across the internet" is a wild exaggerration: 58 unique google hits. I understand your concern, but wikipedia is a collection of things that are known (to someone trustable) or unknown but widely discussed (in reputable sources). Please read WP:NOT, WP:CITE, WP:V. `'mikka(t) 17:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 00:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Brrr... This discussion has triggered another bout of aibohphobia for me. -- Geo Swan 23:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.