The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omegans[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the notability requirements. Since creation in 2005, this article has had no improvement, such as adding reliable sources, and has recently degraded into further original research and speculation. Based on a search through Google Books and Google News there seems little prospect that these issues will be addressed in the near future (unless the article is completely re-written as a summary of the use of the concept in works of fiction). Ash (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 11:08, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Note that there are two very different versions in the history. One is about a stub about an army that will fight on behalf of "Saint Germaine" in a prophesied apocalypse. I presume this refers to the Count of St. Germain. That version was recently swept aside in favor of this, which claims to be about an obscure sect of the Church of England. Books, news, and scholar hits for the term yield nothing that is obviously about either of these notions. The relationship between the two versions is ... obscure. I did find this source, but that would appear to take a strongly contrary view to both prior versions. Most references to "Omegans" are about members of Greek letter organizations like Chi Omega or Psi Omega. Perhaps a disambiguation is in order at this title. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per WP:MADEUP Simonm223 (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:MADEUP 2 says you, says two 21:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article is a complete orphan, with no category and no reference. I suspect that some one would have referred to the subject somewhere and that some source or external link would have been provided. Certainly the whole story seems improbable. One thing that is definitely questionable is the reference to surnames. I am not clear when these became fixed in Monmouthshire, but at Merthyr Tydfil, patronymics were still in use in the 1760s. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.