The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ojaswi Party[edit]

Ojaswi Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, hardly any coverage in newspapers. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 22:16, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most of the links obtain upon google search are party's own website or social networking webs. Also the party is yet to be launched.--Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 20:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dazedbythebell (talk) 15:22, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vigyani BHai Ji ,,,,

Ojaswi is a political party set by Narayan Sai... I have given ref on article OJaswi Party...

Do not delete this page plssssssssssssssss..--Jeeteshvaishya (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.