This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus (1k, 1d, anon vote discounted) . Scimitar ^parley 23:18, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OghamWiki[edit]

Googling "OghamWiki" receives 15 hits, all of which are WP mirrors. It may be a real Wiki system, but it's not even close to notable. ral315 06:07, July 31, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, nonnotable. Nothing to do with Ogham, either. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 07:50, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. But I'd be interested in seeing a Wikipedia Ogham portal. 68.167.63.194 09:12, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I don't think notability is or should be a consideration with free software. This is a reasonably well written article about a real software project with real deliverables that you can download and run, and if I encountered it I'd expect to find an article about it on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't Freshmeat? No, but it's a place for neutral, verifiable articles about everything under the sun. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 15:47, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have performed a cleanup on this article. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 15:55, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.