- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rheinmetall Oerlikon Millennium Gun. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Oerlikon KDG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any sources, related to this specific weapon name. All I seem to find are mentions to Rheinmetall Oerlikon Millennium Gun, which has its own wiki page. I believe this weapon is just a small part of the before mentioned weapon system.
Happy to remove WP:AFD nomination, if reliable sources are found and added to the article. lbmarshall (talk) 12:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax/OR/V failure. Ping me is sources are present. In the current form could be speedied or prodded. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The weapon in question seems to be a recent iteration of the Oerlikon 35mmm revolver gun. Oerlikon abbreviates those weapons models apparently with "KDA", "KDB", "KDC" etc. This article seems to relate to the "KDG" model. There is a German WP article on the 35 mm revolver gun: here. This gun model is apparently the one used in the above mentioned Rheinmetall Oerlikon Millennium Gun / Rheinmetall GDM-008 weapons system. I am not quite sure what to do here, we don't have an article on the general 35mm revolver gun either (not to be confused with other 35mm guns Oerlikon produces, like this one: Oerlikon GDF). Dead Mary (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.