The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy redirect to Oak Grove#Louisiana. seems like clear consensus to me (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oak Grove, Louisiana[edit]

Oak Grove, Louisiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already Oak Grove - we don't need another disambig. It is not clear we need more than one LA Oak Grove article at all. Unfriend15 (talk) 14:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oak Grove, West Carroll Parish, Louisiana was moved from Oak Grove, Louisiana without discussion. I propose to move it back. There was an article created Oak Grove, Lincoln Parish, Louisiana which might require a disambig, if it is need (I am dubious). I added it to the Oak Grove article and added a note to it suggesting it needs to show notability... but that is a minor issue... it may be a fine article but it doesn't require a double-layer-disambiguation, I should think.Unfriend15 (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also added it to the OGWCP article as an SA... there is no other uses tag, and I wonder if it needs one.Unfriend15 (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Oak Grove#Louisiana. Boleyn (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This information is already included in Oak Grove disambiguation. Longevitydude (talk) 00:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Boleyn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paperpencils (talk • contribs) 08:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.