The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NxtGen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Musician only notable for producing a (rather good) political rap. The only part of WP:NMUSIC Donnelly passes is #10, as Donnelly is only really notable in relation to the rap (see both Grauniad sources, both about the rap). Suggest using the sources in relation to the Andrew Lansley article and/or, if ever notable, the proposed NHS reforms. Sceptre ^(talk) 02:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or optionally merge into an appropriate target (e.g., an article about the proposed NHS reforms). As it stands, the only claim to notability appears to be the brief, recent coverage about this particular video, but said coverage might fall under WP:NOTNEWS and/or make this a WP:BLP1E. It is perhaps crystal balling to assume that the individual himself will have any lasting encyclopedic notability, and there is very little actual content on which to justify the existence of a WP:BLP at this time. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non notable artist, which is known for a single event. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 02:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks notablity. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.