The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 18:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nutrisystems Diet[edit]

Nutrisystems Diet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

The article seems just to be repeating information from the company website, and I can't find any coverage of this in any type of reliable source. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 14:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC) Withdraw nomination per below. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 18:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I expanded the article with substantial coverage from Forbes, the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Charlotte Observer, and PC Magazine, out of 128 references in ProQuest. I omitted any that were just financial announcement. It was the subject of a Forbes cover story. With a $2 billion market worth, it is the dominant company in the delivered diet food business, with over $435 million in sales in a $800 million market. Convenient, reasonably tasty, and reasonably cheap at $10 per day. Helps Americans learn how large a portion of food should be. Edison 18:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.