The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all of them. - ulayiti (talk) 13:40, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The remaining articles have been placed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Deleting now... --AllyUnion (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done --AllyUnion (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Articles contained in Category:Nursing care plans[edit]

On 20 Oct 2005 someone uploaded a flurry of supposedly public domain articles from the International Biopharmaceutical Association[1] website, all "nursing care plans" for a host of medical conditions (66 at last count). The pages are largely redundant with the medical conditions they are linked to, and very little original content can be found on them. THB (talk · contribs) tried to knock a few into shape and kindly placed them all in Category:Nursing care plans, but agreed that these pages are beyond hope. An RFC[2] on the situation reached the same conclusion, see Category talk:Nursing care plans.

I am therefore suggesting delete on all 66 articles. Care plans are not encyclopedia articles, and all useful content is redundant with other articles. JFW | T@lk 18:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think nursing care plans belong to an encyclopedia. --WS 19:30, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree completely with JF's assessment. encephalon 22:53, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Good information, but Wiki is not the place for them. Edwardian 23:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not individually notable. BD2412 T 02:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom --Rogerd 03:37, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We at IBPA don't think that your site has a future, with such approach. Deleting 66 articles with very valuable information - is a crime. Who among you understands in Nursing? How could you take responsibility to decide what is good, and what is no good?Do you own this site! It's a shame.

Thank you for your attention. (Unsigned comment from 206.188.102.2 after AFD closure. --AllyUnion (talk) 12:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)) [reply]

If you like to improve the general knowledge of Nursing, you may do so at the Nursing article in a neutral point of view fashion. If you like to contribute more information on the treatment or the natural of illnesses, you may do so at any of the cooresponding illness(es)' articles. --AllyUnion (talk) 12:20, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.