The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. the policy-based arguments here are entirely on the delete side here. Notability is not popularity, an error made in the first keep !vote. The fourth keep vote is little more than WP:ITSUSEFUL All in all, the delete comments are on point, and the keep ones are not. Courcelles 23:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nubiles.net[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed a section entitled "news" that was about activities unrelated to this website (although they did involve porn performers that the article claims are associated with this website). Without that section, the lack of references (and the fact that this article has been previously deleted as spam more than once) suggest that this isn't a notable website. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's one of the more popular adult sites, has high search volume through Google, and is Alexa rank 1,750. Imperi (talk) 23:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - recreation of previously speedied material. The first 3 Cites dont really denote notability, and the second 2 are about the actions of ContentRemove.com and only make passing mention of this website. Sorry, IMO, Nubiles.net just isnt WP:Notable yet. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 02:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Popular or not, lacks independent and substantial published sources to provide verifiable content. Carrite (talk) 04:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This site is continuously being mentioned in association with anti-piracy ventures. Their models are people who are often active in pop culture news and big names in adult entertainment. Their site has a strong Alexa rating. They are leading with adult industry web technology Laurencubed (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Nubiles.net is an active member in the adult community, participating in anti-piracy and often mentioned in correlation with developing technology. The site has over 900 models many of which are constantly searched for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.169.82 (talk) 14:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Nubiles.net has many models that are currently in the wikipedia, and the nubiles.net wiki page would be a perfect reference to the girls own wiki pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swivvle (talk • contribs) 19:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you believe that Nubiles can inherite notability from the Models??? I dont believe so. There are many examples of where this is not true. Florence Henderson's General Foods 25th Anniversary Show: A Salute to Rodgers and Hammerstein. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 11:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No legitimate claims of notability, no reliable independent sourcing providing significant coverage. Content is more promotional than informative. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.