The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DeleteTravellingCarithe Busy Bee 03:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was nominated for CSD G11 by Realkyhick, I thought it had too many editors for that, but it might not be notable. SelketTalk 05:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not CSDable, but still worthy of deletion. All self-reference and redlinked names. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 06:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Obviously, I prefer a speedy, but I'll settle for plain ol' delete. Not notable, self-referenced. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete It's blatant advertising. Maybe notable/maybe not but, still advertising. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Erm ... does anyone disagree with me? --DStoykov (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. At last count, four. The pre-June 9 version does little to change my mind about notability. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 13:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So you disagree that Nu Image "has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources" as per WP:COMPANY? Or do you claim that established criteria are not relevant here? --DStoykov (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.