The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD: debut EP by band whose article has been CSD A7 speedied; completely unsourced; no details other than a tracklist. Stormie (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously. Albums whose bands aren't notable certainly aren't notable. tomasz. 12:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, album by non-notable band. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, because the artists' article was speedily deleted in accordance with criterion WP:CSD#A7. Surely this can't be notable, either. --Mizu onna sango15/Discuss 15:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - album by a nn band --T-rex 16:42, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as insufficiently notable. Perfect example of why it's just silly that WP:CSD#A7 covers bands but not albums. — Satori Son 21:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable album that was created by a speedy-deleted band. — Wenli(reply here) 23:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing visible asserts notability (Although I wish people would be careful with CSD A7, especially on new bands - even an assertion of notability is enough to defeat that.) Andy Dingley (talk) 15:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Band aren't notable enough to have an article, so neither is this EP. - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.