The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted: obvious advertising, and a business that made no showing of importance by substantial coverage in reliable sources. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NoClaimsDiscount.co.uk[edit]

NoClaimsDiscount.co.uk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No reliable source adresses this website in the detail required for an article. The citations are all to people quoting this website - not about the site itself. Hipocrite (talk) 13:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - Blatant Advertising per WP:G11 and I would have tagged it as such. Trevor Marron (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per above. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. In addition to what is said above most of the "references" (5 out of 8, excluding one dead link) are to the company's own website: scarcely independent coverage. There was also one "external link" which was a clear spam link, so I have removed it. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per Speedy Deletion critereon G11. Nothing but spam for NN company. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 14:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete: Clear spam, nothing more to say really...get rid of it! magnius (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.