- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. czar 03:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ninthwave Records[edit]
- Ninthwave Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Record label of dubious notability although they have released music by some notable artists. Not finding independently sourced coverage to satisfy WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Nominating with some regret, as I'm a synthpop fan and own several releases from this label. --Finngall talk 23:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk 23:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- comment Did some searching and found a couple more references and put on talk but not much and only 2 that are not really inherited notability. One that I had put in the info box a long time ago, that probably belongs in the prose if keep and one that is slightly more than a brief mention in billboard. Unfortunately it's hard to see either is that strong. PaleAqua (talk) 00:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the merger I also wonder if BuGoudi House might be worth searching for as newer sources might use that name. Bing news returns one result for BuGoudi House, and Google news a different one but neither seem to mention Ninthwave. PaleAqua (talk) 00:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 00:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it fails to meet the GNG criteria. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.