The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nimkish[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable product. The creator seems to have relation with the brand (See his username). Also reads like an advert. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete pure spam. If this hadn't been nominated here, I would have deleted it on sight Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:38, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as spam. —teb728 t c 07:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: when I nominated the article for discussion, it was not in so bad state. But now, I think speedy is the best way. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 09:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.