The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Hipster[edit]

Nigel Hipster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Unsourced protologism. Repeatedly reposted speedy, bringing here for consensus decision. NawlinWiki 16:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, google search has no notable results RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 16:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The Google Search provides plenty of notable examples of the usage of this term. Eiren 16:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The only places I can find this term being used are blogs, forums and MySpaces. -- Steel 16:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not a notable term, nothing useful through any SE (Google, Google News, Yahoo, Live Search, Ask). Jayden54 16:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as WP:NEO. The Rambling Man 17:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete dicdef of borderline term. - Peregrine Fisher 22:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Protologism. ShadowHalo 06:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete google "Nigel Hipster" in quotes yields 66 hits 16 relevant hits. Not notable. Static Universe 00:21, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.