The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Miller (writer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A novelist who has not released his first novel fails any reasonable definition of WP:NOTABILITY Nat Gertler (talk) 02:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. This young man is just starting out and is not an established author in the remotest sense. Seaphoto^Talk 03:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject of this article does not appear to meet the guidelines WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. WP:CRYSTAL also applied here as we cannot predict if this person will eventually meet the guidelines. VQuakr (talk) 03:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article lacks reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for authors. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 03:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promo page. —Lowellian (reply) 10:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.