The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Newnet[edit]

This just to add the standard header for below IP nomination. No opinion Tikiwont 14:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for my listing: Newnet fails WP:CORP, WP isn't a directory for ISP providers in the UK. 208.252.22.251 14:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - unsourced, so no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in third-party sources to establish notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 14:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with IP user 208 this company is very small and I have never heard of them at all. Seems more like an oppertunity for a bit of free advertising --PrincessBrat 17:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless that total lack of indication of notability and sources is fixed. Nuttah68 21:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When unknown companies start talking about being Internet pioneers you know it's an advert.

Delete per WP:CORP unless notability is established through sources. Simple verification through the company web site won't be enough. -- Black Falcon 01:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.