The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Land Information New Zealand since there are no objections. – Joe (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Geospatial Office[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have no reason to doubt that the content was correct when written, but there are no references, I have not been able to verify the content, and I suspect that the Office has gone out of existence in a reorganisation of Land Information New Zealand. The article says the Office was a four-person unit within a division of LINZ and, combined with the lack of sources, it is questionable whether the Office was ever notable. If the content was verifiable I might have suggested merging it into Land Information New Zealand. As it is, I suggest simply converting it into a redirect to Land Information New Zealand. Nurg (talk) 08:31, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into LINZ. Hyperbolick (talk) 12:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.