The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No reasons have been provided for keeping, while on th other side it is correctly argued that the articles lacks an assertion of notability (see WP:CSD#A7), lacks the multiple reliable sources required for notability, and generally lacks attribution to reliable sources. Sandstein 20:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New South Wales University Theatrical Society[edit]

Another non-notable student organization. The best this article claims about the subject in terms of notability is its being a large club at New South Wales University. Great, but that does not warrant an article. This would work much better as a student newspaper article. Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 11:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first AFD discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New South Wales University Theatrical Society resolved with no consensus, but discussion leaned toward a merge. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 11:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Asw stated, this is another student society that makes no claim to notability and gives no indication of relevance beyond the university. Nuttah68 22:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article makes no claims that this is a notable organisation in Australian threatre and a Google News Archive search can come up with none. Might be worth mentioning on the University of New South Wales article. Capitalistroadster 00:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 00:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move into a broader article on clubs and club culture at Sydney University. See also Previous AfD ...maelgwn talk 01:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney University and UNSW are different universities. JRG 03:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops must have been napping, thats what i mean to say, article on Clubs at UNSW. Maybe from previous AfD suggestions - Move University_of_New_South_Wales_Student_Guild to Student Clubs and Associations at University of New South Wales or such like, to which the content from this article could be moved ...maelgwn talk 00:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can't do that either - the Student Guild I assume ran the Clubs and Societies program, but it encompassed far more than that. I don't go to UNSW, but I'm sure Joestella or someone like that who did can tell you more - but I'm pretty sure that it did a lot more than just club stuff. JRG 22:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment - So is that then a vote for a delete and merge? Because I am amenable to that. I think that's probably the best outcome for this. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 00:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Can this AfD debate be closed and listed properly as a 2nd nomination where the 1st nomination result was keep? I don't see new information here that suggests the first result should be overturned, certainly not in favour of a deletion. Nonetheless, the first discussion is relevant and it would be better if it was referred to in a prominent postion as is usual. Warm regards, --Greatwalk 01:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Greatwalk, and failing that, per Joestella below. JRG 03:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- keep or merge - persistent re-nomination for deletion isn't nice, per Greatwalk. Unfortunately, the article University of New South Wales student clubs and associations does not exist as a merge target - are we instead referring to a subsection within the university article? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep club is of a significant size and age. Suggest the article be improved somewhat though. Joestella 06:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Capitalistroadster. --Peta 23:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge into school article. The club is not all that old and the article, other then the list of productions does not have much content. The suggested merges by maelgwn could however be the better solution and I would not object to someone being bold and doing those merges. I would use University of New South Wales student clubs and associations as the merge target, I think that is a more correct name. Vegaswikian 22:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 19:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A keep vote requires independent reliable sources demonstrating that this organization is notable. If these are forthcoming, my vote would change. --Shirahadasha 06:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability. Student organizations are not inherently notable. Caknuck 17:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.