The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neville Thurlbeck[edit]

Neville Thurlbeck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This BLP stub seems like an obvious BLP1E case, no reliable sources have written about this individual apart from in regard to the one legal case mentioned. Polly (Parrot) 17:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also invovled in breaking a story over David Beckham's private life [1] and the recent phone tapping scandal [2]. Thank you Google 92.23.165.153 (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • Also "outed" a labour Cabinet Minister - do we have a BLP4E policy :-) 92.23.165.153 (talk) 21:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As chief reporter for one of the world's highest-selling newspapers he's pretty obviously going to be notable, and that's confirmed by the sources found above. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:32, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, I'm not sure whether leading reporters for major newspapers are necessarily notable, but the sources on this guy ensure that he is. Nyttend (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I'm usually very critical of WP:BLP1E and of what I often see as false notability for journalists, but neither apply to him. Certainly more than one event and his notability is beyond trivial mentions, has significant coverage. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Clearly someone who has had a colourful career. Numerous cites. Francium12 (talk) 21:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.