The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 11:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Reilly[edit]

Non notable politician. Being a mere candidate for election is not sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia and no evidence of notability outside his candidature is asserted. Mattinbgn\^talk 22:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 22:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment With the election four weeks away I would have held off. Saves us the trouble of deleting an article only to have it recreated right away. --Dhartung | Talk 22:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I disagree strongly. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and articles of this type should not be kept on the chance that the subject will become notable in the future. If this means recreating an article at a future date when notability is established then so be it. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article cites no reliable sources. — Ksero 01:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has attracted some coverage on Google News sources. [1]. However, there are no sources establishing notability outside his candidacy and while he has some prospects, he will probably not achieve the 9.5% swing to win the seat. Certainly worth a mention in an article on the election in Gilmore if there is one and obviously a standalone article if elected. Capitalistroadster 02:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability outside this race, which he hasn't won, and likely won't. If he does win, a far better article could be created than this stub anyway. Nick Graves 18:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is nothing to indicate notability has been achieved yet. If that changes an article can be created. Nuttah68 17:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.