The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

National Credit Ratings Limited[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I cannot find any coverage that would be considered in-depth or reliable. Article is currently without any references other than an external link to company website. CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 04:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 04:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Aside from the problem of finding sources, I'm not seeing any claim to significance here. The article merely states that it is a business that was incorporated on a certain date in a certain place. That brevity of description works well in a business directory, but not an encyclopedia. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I would've also considered A7, it may at best be removed for borderline but this is certainly not solid for any Wikipedia article yet. SwisterTwister talk 19:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.