The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NamePros[edit]

Fails to meet WP:CORP and isn't even barely notable. Delete GreenJoe 22:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non-notable and fails to meet WP:CORP. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CORP and anyway, the only reference provided is from the company's own site. - Ozzykhan 18:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 16:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - only link is to company's own site, so no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in independent sources to establish notability per WP:CORP. Delete unless sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 18:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete no assertion of notability per WP:CORP _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 20:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.