The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nain (surname)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing is notable or informative in this article, spent a few minutes to find something, but there is nothing available to source or expand. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 04:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Existence does not imply notability; just that a surname exists in multiple regions is not notable by itself, but documented wide spread and/or importance. Also bad linking for the word "Jats", which is now linked to some journal system instead of the Jat people by context (was stuck without clue for some time because of this lol). 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 10:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jats link fixed now. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 10:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Just another name. - Sitush (talk) 14:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.